1 Hanoi University of Natural Resources and Environment; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org
*Corresponding author: email@example.com; Tel.: +84–968672336
The construction of hydroelectric power plants to develop electricity sources is one of the critical factors of the economic development in Kon Tum Province. Investing in the construction of hydroelectric work contributes to the national electricity source. It also actively contributes to the local irrigation by providing water in the dry season and reducing floods in the wet season. Dak Bla Thuong hydropower plant is in line with the master plan of the Dak Bla river basin, and will optimally exploit energy for the planned river section without affecting neighboring systems in the Dak Po Co river system. Besides, it will contribute to adding a significant energy source to the national power system with a total installed capacity of 9.0 MW and an annual electricity output of about Eo = 31.85 million KW. This paper used a purely statistical method based on a series of hydrological data from 1977 to 2019 to calculate some hydrological features such as standard volumetric flow rate, the minimum monthly flow, the design of flood discharge maximum, etc to serve the licensing of exploitation and use of surface water, ensuring that the work implements well the task of generating electricity while ensuring the minimum flow to the downstream to diminish the risk which is caused by the operation process of electricity generation.
Cite this paper
Thuong, L.T.; Quang, N.T.; Minh, T.T.H. Calculation of hydrological features for serving the exploitation and use of surface water of Dakbla Thuong hydropower plant. VN J. Hydrometeorol. 2022, 12, 80-95.
1. Vineet, K.S.; Neha, S.C.; Kushwaha, D. An overview or hydro – electric power plant. ISST J. Mech. Eng. 2015, 1, 59–62.
2. Cowan, K.; Daim, T.; Anderson, T. Exploring the impact of technology development and adoption for sustainable hydroelectric power and storage technologies in the Pacific Northwest United States. Energy 2010, 35(12), 4771–4779.
3. Benjamin, K.S.; Dhakal, S.; Gippner, O.; Bambawale, M.J. Halting hydro: A review of the socio–technical barriers to hydroelectric power plants in Nepal. Energy 2017, 36(5), 3468–3476.
Kao, S.C.; Sale, M.J. Projecting changes in annual hydropower generation using regional runoff data: An assessment of the United States federal hydropower plants. Energy 2015, 80, 239–250.
4. Abdulkadir, T.; Salami, A.; Anwar, A.; Kareem, A. Modelling of Hydropower Reservoir Variables for Energy Generation: Neural Network Approach. Ethiop. J. Environ. Stud. Manag. 2013, 6, 310–316.
5. Pechlivanidis, I.G.; Jackson, B.M.; Mcintyre, N.R.; Wheater, H.S. Catchment Scale Hydrological Modelling (2011): A Review of Model Types, Calibration Approaches and Uncertainty Analysis Methods in the Context of Recent Developments in Technology and Applications. Glob. NEST J. 2011, 13, 193–214.
6. Roy, B.; Singh, M.P. An Empirical–Based Rainfall–Runoff Modelling Using Optimization Technique. Int. J. River Basin Manag. 2020, 18, 49–67.
7. Mishra, S.; Saravanan, C.; Dwivedi, V.K.; Shukla, J.P. Rainfall–Runoff Modeling Using Clustering and Regression Analysis for the River Brahmaputra Basin. J. Geol. Soc. India 2018, 92, 305–312.
8. Zhang, Y.; Chiew, F.H.S.; Li, M.; Post, D. Predicting Runoff Signatures Using Regression and Hydrological Modeling Approaches. Water Resour. Res. 2018, 54, 7859–7878.
9. Ramana, G.V. Regression Analysis of Rainfall and Runoff Process of a Typical Watershed. Int. J. Sci. Appl. Inf. Technol. 2014, 3, 16–26.
10. Sitterson, J.; Knightes, C.D.; Parmar, R.; Wolfe, K.; Avant, B.; Muche, M.E. An Overview of Rainfall–Runoff Model Types. In Proceedings of the 9th International Congress on Environmental Modelling and Software, Fort Collins, CO, USA, 2018, pp. 24–28.
11. Audu, L.M.; Musa, N.A. Model Development for Discharge Data Extension for Ungauged Rivers Channels: A Case Study of the Proposed River Orle Hydropower Plant. Proceeding of the 2nd International Conference on Advances in Mechanical Engineering (ICAME–22), Islamabad, Pakistan, 25 August 2022.
12. Pontoni, F.; Creti, A.; Joëts, M. Economic and Environmental Implications of Hydropower Concession Renewals: A Case Study in Southern France. Revue Économique 2018, 69(2), 241–266.
13. Sung, T.V.; Bang, N.T. Evaluation of impacts of Cam Thuy 1 hydropower project on Cam Luong fish stream and water transport on Ma river. J. Constr. Sci. Technol. 2012, 8, 73–83.
14. Thai, N.Q. Research on calculation and regulation of reservoirs to improve operation efficiency of A Vuong hydropower plant. Master’s thesis in Engineering, University of Danang, 2013.
15. Nghia, N.V. Study on selecting a reasonable power generation operation process for the Krong No 2 and 3 hydroelectricity ladders. J. Constr. Sci. Technol. 2017, 41, 1–9.
16. Bang, N.T.; Cuong, P.D. Building algorithms and programs to calculate hydroelectricity, economic efficiency of stored hydropower stations in Vietnam. J. Constr. Sci. Technol. 2010, 2, 31–41.
17. Nghia, N.V. Determining parameters of small and medium hydroelectric power stations regulating working days in flooded dam. J. Water Resour. Sci. Technol. 2019, 54, 1–9.
18. Prime Minister. Decision No. 1182/QD–TTg dated July 17, 2014 promulgating the process of inter–reservoir operation in the Sesan river basin, 2014.
19. Law on Water Resources. No.: 17/2012/QH13, June 21, 2012.
20. Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment. Circular 64/2017/TT–BTNMT dated December 22, 2017 Regulations on determining minimum flows in rivers, streams and downstream of reservoirs and dams, 2017.