Authors

Trieu Anh Ngoc 1* , Vu Thi Hoai Thu 2 , Can Thu Van 3

Affiliations

1 Thuy Loi University, 175 Tay Son, Dong Da, Hanoi, Vietnam; ngocta@tlu.edu.vn
2 University of Transport Ho Chi Minh City; Hoaithu.vu@ut.edu.vn
3 Ho Chi Minh University of Natural Resources and Environment; ctvan@hcmunre.edu.vn
*Corresponding author: ngocta@tlu.edu.vn; Tel.: +84–902789267

Abstracts

Seawater intrusion poses many severe issues in many coastal areas around the world, including the Mekong Delta, Vietnam. For sustainable water management in such regions requires, it is crucial to understand the characteristics of salinization. This study aims to investigate the characteristics of the salinization phenomenon in water systems and its controlling factors based on hydrogeochemical analysis, seawater-freshwater mixing model and End Members Mixing Analysis. The results revealed that seawater intrusion negatively affects strongly on surface water quality with different magnitudes, depending on seasonal variation and tidal regime. It was estimated that surface water mixed with approximately 29.5% and 4.12% of seawater in the dry season and rainy season, respectively. However, it was found that the salinity in groundwater showed less seasonal variation and was distributed heterogeneously following the depth of screened wells and distance to the sea. The mixing ratio between seawater and groundwater varied widely, ranging from less than 10% in deep groundwater up to a maximum of 38% in shallow groundwater. Surface water salinization in the study area is controlled by upstream discharge, tidal regime, and operation of sluice gates. Meanwhile, groundwater salinization might be governed by geological characteristics, original recharge sources, human intervention, and natural variation, especially excessive groundwater exploitation in the Mekong Delta. Therefore, integrated sustainable groundwater and surface water use and management strategies in the Mekong Delta are needed in the context of human-nature intervention.

Keywords

Seawater intrusion; Seawater-Freshwarer Mixing; Soc Trang; Vietnam.

Cite this paper

Ngoc, T.A.; Thu, V.T.H.; Van, C.T. Characteristics of seawater intrusion in Soc Trang province, Vietnam. J. Hydro-Meteorol. 2024, 18, 1-11. ​

References

1. Alfarrah, N.; Walraevens, K. Groundwater overexploitation and seawater intrusion in coastal areas of arid and semi-arid regions. Water 2018, 10(2), 143.

2. Williams, V.J. The ecological effects of salt water intrusion on the agriculture industry after hurricane Katrina. New York, NY: Springer New York, 2009.

3. Herbert, E.R.; Boon, P.; Burgin, A.J.; Neubauer, S.C.; Franklin, R.B.; Ardón, M.; Hopfensperger, K.N.; Lamers, L.P.M.; Gell, P. A global perspective on wetland salinization: ecological consequences of a growing threat to freshwater wetlands. Ecosphere 2015, 6(10), 206.

4. Khan, A.; Ireson, A.; Kovats, S. Drinking water salinity and maternal health in coastal Bangladesh: implications of climate change. Environ. Health Perspect 2011, 119.

5. Khan, A.E.; et al. Salinity in Drinking Water and the Risk of (Pre)Eclampsia and Gestational Hypertension in Coastal Bangladesh: A Case-Control Study. PLoS ONE, 2014, 9(9), e108715.

6. Talukder, M.R.R.; et al. Drinking water salinity and risk of hypertension: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch. Environ. Occup. Health 2017, 72(3), 126–138.

7. Arslan, H.; Demir, Y. Impacts of seawater intrusion on soil salinity and alkalinity in Bafra Plain, Turkey. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2013, 185(2), 1027–1040.

8. Todd, D.K. Salt water intrusion of coastal aquifers in the United States, in Subterranean Water. 1960.

9. Konikow, L.F.; Reilly, T.E. Seawater intrusion in the United States, in seawater intrusion in coastal aquifers – concepts, methods and practices. Bear, J.; et al. Editors. Springer Netherlands: Dordrecht. 1999, pp. 463–506.

10. Barlow, P.M.; Reichard, E.G. Saltwater intrusion in coastal regions of North America. Hydrogeol. J. 2010, 18(1), 247–260.

11. Shi, L.; Jiao, J.J. Seawater intrusion and coastal aquifer management in China: a review. Environ. Earth Sci. 2014, 72(8), 2811–2819.

12. Han, D.; Currell, M.J. Delineating multiple salinization processes in a coastal plain aquifer, northern China: hydrochemical and isotopic evidence. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 2018, 22(6), 3473–3491.

13. Datta, B.; Vennalakanti, H.; Dhar, A. Modeling and control of saltwater intrusion in a coastal aquifer of Andhra Pradesh, India. J. Hydro-environ. Res. 2009, 3(3), 148–159.

14. Kanagaraj, G.; et al. Hydrogeochemical processes and influence of seawater intrusion in coastal aquifers south of Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2018, 25(9), 8989–9011.

15. Steyl, G.; Dennis, I. Review of coastal-area aquifers in Africa. Hydrogeol. J. 2010, 18(1), 217–225.

16. Nofal, E.R.; et al. Delineation and modeling of seawater intrusion into the Nile Delta Aquifer: A new perspective. Water Sci. 2015, 29(2), 156–166.

17. Sadeg, S.; Karahanoðlu, N. Numerical assessment of seawater intrusion in the Tripoli region, Libya. Environ. Geol. 2001, 40(9), 1151–1168.

18. Haddout, S.; Igouzal, M.; Maslouhi, A. Seawater Intrusion in Semi-Closed Convergent Estuaries (Case Study of Moroccan Atlantic Estuaries): Application of Salinity Analytical Models. Mar. Geod. 2017, 40(5), 275–296.

19. Himi, M.; et al. Geophysical characterization of saltwater intrusion in a coastal aquifer: The case of Martil-Alila plain (North Morocco). J. Afr. Earth. Sci. 2017, 126, 136–147.

20. Zghibi, A.; Tarhouni, J.; Zouhri, L. Assessment of seawater intrusion and nitrate contamination on the groundwater quality in the Korba coastal plain of Cap-Bon (North-east of Tunisia). J. Afr. Earth. Sci. 2013, 87, 1–12.

21. Trabelsi, N.; et al. Aquifer vulnerability and seawater intrusion risk using GALDIT, GQISWI and GIS: case of a coastal aquifer in Tunisia. Environ. Earth Sci. 2016. 75(8), 669.

22. Ayed, B.; et al. Assessment of Seawater Intrusion in the Maritime Djeffara Coastal Aquifer (Southeastern Tunisia). in Recent Advances in Environmental Science from the Euro-Mediterranean and Surrounding Regions. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018.

23. Badaruddin, S.; Werner, A.D.; Morgan, L.K. Characteristics of active seawater intrusion. J. Hydrol. 2017, 551(C), 632–647.

24. Fleckenstein, J.H.; et al. Groundwater-surface water interactions: New methods and models to improve understanding of processes and dynamics. Adv. Water Resour. 2010, 33(11), 1291–1295.

25. Trung, N.H.; Tri, V.P.D. Possible impacts of seawater intrusion and strategies for water management in coastal areas in the Vietnamese Mekong Delta in the context of climate change A2 - Thao, Nguyen Danh, in Coastal Disasters and Climate Change in Vietnam, H. Takagi and M. Esteban, Editors. Elsevier: Oxford. 2014, pp. 219–232.

26. Nguyen, A.D.; Savenije, H.H. Salt intrusion in multi-channel estuaries: a case study in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss. 2006, 10(5), 743–754.

27. Vu, D.T.; Yamada, T.; Ishidaira, H. Assessing the impact of sea level rise due to climate change on seawater intrusion in Mekong Delta, Vietnam. Water Sci. Technol. 2018, 77(6), 1632–1639.

28. Thanh, N.C. Saltwater Intrusion - An Evident Impact of Climate Change in the MD and Propose Adaptable Solutions. Am. J. Environ. Resour. Econ. 2016, 1(1), 1–8.

29. Sebastian, L.; et al. The drought and salinity intrusion in the Mekong River Delta of Vietnam - Assessment report. 2016.

30. An, T.D.; et al. Isotopic and Hydrogeochemical Signatures in Evaluating Groundwater Quality in the Coastal Area of the Mekong Delta, Vietnam, in Advances and Applications in Geospatial Technology and Earth Resources: Proceedings of the International Conference on Geo-Spatial Technologies and Earth Resources 2017, Tien Bui, D. et al. Editors. Springer International Publishing: Cham. 2018, pp. 293–314.

31. Dang, T.D.; et al. Hydrological alterations from water infrastructure development in the Mekong floodplains. Hydrol. Processes 2016, 30(21), 3824–3838.

32. Manh, N.V.; et al. Future sediment dynamics in the Mekong Delta floodplains: Impacts of hydropower development, climate change and sea level rise. Global Planet. Change 2015, 127, 22–33.

33. Hoang, L.P.; et al. Mekong River flow and hydrological extremes under climate change. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2016, 20(7), 3027–3041.

34. Nhan, N.H. Tidal regime deformation by sea level rise along the coast of the Mekong Delta. Estuarine. Estuarine Coastal Shelf Sci. 2016, 183, 382–391.

35. Lauri, H.; et al. Future changes in Mekong River hydrology: impact of climate change and reservoir operation on discharge. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2012, 16(12), 4603–4619.

36. Elena, G.; Dianne, M. Environmental and political implications of Vietnam's water vulnerabilities: A multiscale assessment. Singapore J. Trop. Geogr. 2016, 37(1), 59–75.

37. Smajgl, A.; et al. Responding to rising sea levels in the Mekong Delta. Nat. Clim. Change 2015, 5(2), 167–174.

38. Shrestha, S.; Bach, T.V.; Pandey, V.P. Climate change impacts on groundwater resources in Mekong Delta under representative concentration pathways (RCPs) scenarios. Environ. Sci. Policy. 2016, 61, 1–13.

39. Chea, R.; Grenouillet, G.; Lek, S. Evidence of Water Quality Degradation in Lower Mekong Basin Revealed by Self-Organizing Map. PLOS ONE 2016, 11(1), e0145527.

40. Wagner, F.; Tran, V.B.; Renaud, F.G. Groundwater Resources in the Mekong Delta: Availability, Utilization and Risks, in The Mekong Delta System: Interdisciplinary Analyses of a River Delta, F.G. Renaud and C. Kuenzer, Editors. Springer Netherlands: Dordrecht. 2012, pp. 201–220.

41. Appelo, C.A.J. Cation and proton exchange, pH variations, and carbonate reactions in a freshening aquifer. Water Resour. Res. 1994, 30(10), 2793–2805.

42. Hooper, R.P.; Christophersen, N.; Peters, N.E. Modelling streamwater chemistry as a mixture of soilwater end-members – An application to the Panola Mountain catchment, Georgia, U.S.A. J. Hydrol. 1990, 116(1), 321–343.

43. James, A.L.; Roulet, N.T. Investigating the applicability of end-member mixing analysis (EMMA) across scale: A study of eight small, nested catchments in a temperate forested watershed. Water Resour. Res. 2006, 42(8), W08434.

44. Barthold, F.K.; et al. How many tracers do we need for end member mixing analysis (EMMA)? A sensitivity analysis. Water Resour. Res. 2011, 47(8), W08519.

45. Pelizardi, F.; et al. Identifying geochemical processes using End Member Mixing Analysis to decouple chemical components for mixing ratio calculations. J. Hydrol. 2017, 550, 144–156.

46. Gracz, M.B.; et al. Analyzing peatland discharge to streams in an Alaskan watershed: An integration of end-member mixing analysis and a water balance approach. J. Hydrol. 2015, 530, 667–676.

47. Sakakibara, K.; et al. Spatiotemporal variation of the surface water effect on the groundwater recharge in a low-precipitation region: Application of the multi-tracer approach to the Taihang Mountains, North China. J. Hydrol. 2017, 545, 132–144.