Authors

Affiliations

1 HUTECH Institute of Applied Sciences, HUTECH University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam; tt.nguyen@hutech.edu.vn; lochenni@gmail.com; tv.nam@hutech.edu.vn

2 Faculty of Biology and Environment, Ho Chi Minh City University of Industry and Trade, 140 Le Trong Tan, Ho Chi Minh 700000, Viet Nam; lhuyba@gmail.com

*Corresponding author: tv.nam@hutech.edu.vn; Tel: +84945007990

Abstracts

In this study, the objective was to employ experimental design in order to optimize the efficiency of diesel oil removal from water using activated carbon sourced from rambutan peel. A central composite design was utilized to investigate the impact of contact time, adsorbent dosage, initial oil concentration, and pH on both the removal efficiency and oil adsorption capacity across 30 different experimental designs. The analysis of activated carbon properties derived from rambutan peel revealed a BET surface area of 786.014 m2/g, a BJH adsorption cumulative pore volume of 0.054 cm3/g, and an average BJH adsorption pore diameter of 55.243 nm. The quadratic model was employed to estimate the mathematical relationship between the removal efficiency and adsorption capacity of diesel oil in relation to the four key independent variables. The ANOVA analysis demonstrates F-values of 12.36 and 39.92 for the respective models, both exhibiting ρ-values < 0.05. The predicted values closely align with experimental results, showcasing R2 values of 92.02% for removal efficiency and 97.39% for adsorption capacity. The investigation anticipates that, based on the analysis of 87 solutions, optimal conditions of 70.60 minutes of contact time, 0.25 g/g adsorbent dosage, 0.97% v/v initial oil concentration, and a pH of 6.20 will yield a maximum removal efficiency of 72.12% and a maximum adsorption capacity of 5.3570 g/g. This combination of factors achieves a desirability rating of 0.741.

Keywords

Cite this paper

Nguyen, T.T.; Loc, N.D.; Ba, L.H.; Nam, V.T. Experimental optimization to enhance oil removal efficiency from water using carbonized rambutan peel. J. Hydro-Meteorol. 2024, 18, 12-23.

References

1. Kolokoussis, P.; Karathanassi, V. Oil spill detection and mapping using sentinel 2 imagery. J. Mar. Sci. 2018, 6, 1–12.

2. Alaa El-Din, G.; Amer, A.A.; Malsh, G.; Hussein, M. Study on the use of banana peels for oil spill removal. Alex. Eng. J. 2018, 57, 2061–2068.

3. El-Nafaty, U.A.; Muhammad, I.M.; Abdulsalam, S. Biosorption and kinetic studies on oil removal from produced water using banana peel. Civ. Environ. Res. 2013, 3, 125–136.

4. Idris, J.; Eyu, G.D.; Mansor, A.M.; Ahmad, Z.; Chukwuekezie, C.S. A preliminary study of biodegradable waste as sorbent material for oil-spill cleanup. Sci. World J. 2014, 2014, 1–5.

5. Banerjee, S.S.; Joshi, M.V.; Jayaram, R.V. Treatment of oil spill by sorption technique using fatty acid grafted sawdust. Chemosphere 2006, 64, 1026–1031.

6. Maulion, R.V.; Abacan, S.A.; Allorde, G.G.; Umali, M.C.S. Oil spill adsorption capacity of activated carbon tablets from corncobs in simulated oil-water mixture. Asia Pac. J. Multidiscip. Res. 2015, 3, 146–151.

7. Aljeboree, A.M.; Alshirifi, A.N.; Alkaim, A.F. Kinetics and equilibrium study for the adsorption of textile dyes on coconut shell activated carbon. Alex. Eng. J. 2017, 10, S3381–S3393.

8. Anwana Abel, U.; Rhoda Habor, G.; Innocent Oseribho, O. Adsorption studies of oil spill clean-up using coconut coir activated carbon (CCAC). Am. J. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 36–47.

9. Igwegbe, C.A.; Umembamalu, C.J.; Osuagwu, E.U.; Oba, S.N.; Emembolu, L.N. Studies on adsorption characteristics of corn cobs activated carbon for the removal of oil and grease from oil refinery desalter effluent in a downflow fixed bed adsorption equipment. Eur. J. Sustain. Dev. Res. 2020, 5, 1–14.

10. Atemkeng, C.D.; Anagho, G.S.; Tagne, R.F.T.; Amola, L.A.; Bopda, A.; Kamgaing, T. Optimization of 4-nonylphenol adsorption on activated carbons derived from safou seeds using response surface methodology. Carbon Trends. 2021, 4, 100052.

11. Silgado, K.J.; Marrugo, G.D.; Puello, J. Adsorption of chromium (VI) by activated carbon produced from oil palm endocarp. Chem. Eng. Trans. 2014, 37, 721–726.

12. Nguyen, T.T.; Loc, N.D.; Ba, L.H.; Nam, T.V. Efficient oil removal from water using carbonized rambutan peel: Isotherm and kinetic studies. Vietnam Journal of Hydrometeorology. 2023, 4, 1–18.

13. Hussein, M.; Amer, A. A.; Sawsan, I. I. Oil spill sorption using carbonized pith bagasse: 1. Preparation and characterization of carbonized pith bagasse. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis. 2008, 82(2), 205–211.

14. Angelova, D.; Uzunov, I.; Uzunova, S.; Gigova, A.; Minchev, L. Kinetics of oil and oil products adsorption by carbonized rice husks. J. Chem. Eng. 2011, 172(1), 306–311.

15. Olufemi, B. A.; Otolorin, F. Comparative adsorption of crude oil using mango (Mangnifera indica) shell and mango shell activated carbon. Environ. Eng. Res. 2017, 22(4), 384–392.

16. Oliveira, E.; Santos, J.; Goncalves, A.P.; Mattedi, S.; Jose, N. Characterization of the rambutan peel fiber (nephelium lappaceum) as a lignocellulosic material for technological applications. Chem. Eng. Trans. 2016, 50, 391–396.

17. Khataee, A.R. Optimization of UV-promoted peroxydisulphate oxidation of C.I. Basic blue 3 using response surface methodology. Environ. Technol. 2010, 31, 73–86.

18. Draper, N.R.; John, J.A. Response-Surface Designs for Quantitative and Qualitative Variables. Technometrics. 1988, 30, 423–428.

19. Bayuo, J.; Pelig-Ba, K.B.; Abukari, M.A. Optimization of adsorption parameters for effective removal of lead (II) from aqueous solution. Phys. Chem.: Indian J. 2019, 14, 1–25.

20. Izevbekhai, O.U.; Gitari, W.M.; Tavengwa, N.T.; Ayinde, W.B.; Mudzielwana, R. Response surface optimization of oil removal using synthesized polypyrrole-silica polymer composite. Molecules 2020, 25, 4628.

21. Ahmad, M.A.; Alrozi, R. Optimization of rambutan peel based activated carbon preparation conditions for remazol brilliant blue R removal. J. Chem. Eng. 2011, 168, 280–285.

22. Naderi, M. Chapter fourteen - surface area: brunauer–emmett–teller (BET). Progress in Filtration and Separation. 2015, pp. 585–608.

23. Mourabet, M.; El Rhilassi, A.; El Boujaady, H.; Bennani-Ziatni, M.; Taitai, A. Use of response surface methodology for optimization of fluoride adsorption in an aqueous solution by Brushite. Arab. J. Chem. 2017, 10, S3292–S3302.

24. Owolabi, R.U.; Usman, M.A.; Kehinde, A.J. Modelling and optimization of process variables for the solution polymerization of styrene using response surface methodology. J. King Saud Univ. Eng. Sci. 2018, 30, 22–30.

25. Nnamdi Ekwueme, B.; Anthony Ezema, C.; Asadu, C.O.; Elijah Onu, C.; Onah, T.O.; Sunday Ike, I.; Chinonyelum Orga, A. Isotherm modelling and optimization of oil layer removal from surface water by organic acid activated plantain peels fiber. Arab. J. Chem. 2023, 16, 104443.

26. NwabuezeH, H.O.; Chiaha, P.N.; Ezekannagha, B.C.; Okoani, O.E. Acetylation of corn cobs using iodine catalyst, for oil spills remediation. Int. J. Eng. Sci. 2016, 5(9), 53–59.

27. Vlaev, L.; Petkov, P.; Dimitrov, A.; Genieva, S. Cleanup of water polluted with crude oil or diesel fuel using rice husks ash. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 2011, 42(6), 957–964.