Authors

Affiliations

1 Faculty of Environment and Natural Resources, Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology (HCMUT); tnhtrang.sdh222@hcmut.edu.vn; volephu@hcmut.edu.vn; lvtrung@hcmut.edu.vn
2 Vietnam National University Ho Chi Minh City (VNU-HCM); tnhtrang.sdh222@hcmut.edu.vn; volephu@hcmut.edu.vn; lvtrung@hcmut.edu.vn
3 Department of Geodesy, Cartography and GIS, Ho Chi Minh City University of Natural Resources and Environment; tnhtrang.sdh222@hcmut.edu.vn
4 Long Thanh Protective Forest Management Board; daongocduc1991@gmail.com
*Corresponding author: tnhtrang.sdh222@hcmut.edu.vn; volephu@hcmut.edu.vn;
Tel.: +84–98615481; +84–933902908

Abstracts

In recent years, Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) technology has advanced substantially, which created new opportunities in developing monitoring applications for forest resources management. UAVs are capable of flying and capturing at varying altitudes, angles, and attaining precise images. These collected data are continuously, quickly, efficiently, and crucially provide insight into forest health situations. Importantly, these captured images cover other useful factors such as changes in the status of biodiversity, deforestation, and forest recovery. The aim of this study is to combine UAV images with satellite imagery for a powerful tool in monitoring and evaluating forest dynamics and resources. Accordingly, Landsat 8 images in 2020, UAV images 2023 and GIS technology were employed to create a forest map in Xuyen Moc district, Ba Ria - Vung Tau province allowing an evaluation of changes in forest area over a spanning period of 2020-2023. The results indicated that the forest area changed at a rate of 4.1% (9.37 ha) in which the largest change was bare land with a substantial decrease of 8.08 ha meanwhile restored forests increased a remarkable area of 7.85 ha over the period 2020-2023. These changes were detected by overlaying forest maps 2020 and 2023 with the accuracy is 90.6% and Kappa coefficient was 0.87%. The findings suggest that the latest application of UAVs coupled with GIS technology brought significant conveniences with images retrieved from UAVs, providing a quick, reliable and competitive approach to the management practices of forest resources.

Keywords

Cite this paper

Trang, T.N.H.; Duc, D.N.; Trung, L.V.; Phu, V.L. Combining UAV and satellite images to assess forest changes: A case study in Phuoc Thuan commune, Xuyen Moc district, Ba Ria - Vung Tau province in the period 2020-2023J. Hydro-Meteorol. 202420, 84-95.

References

1. Paulinus, C.A.; John, J.I.I., Colman, C.I. Our forests, our environment, our sustainable livelihoods. Eur. J. Acad. Essays. 2015, 2(4), 6–19.

2. David, O.E. Importance of forest and trees in sustaining water supply and rainfall. Niger. J. Educ. Health Technol. Res. 2016, 1–8.

3. Per, A.; Terrence, B.; Michael, M. Challenges and solutions for forest biodiversity conservation in Sweden: Assessment of policy, implementation outputs, and consequences. J. Land. 2023, 12(5), 1098.

4. Kandasamy, G.; Sabariswaran, K.; Mathiyazhagan, N. Influences of wildfire on the forest ecosystem and climate change: A comprehensive study. J. Environ. Res. 2024, 240(2), 117537.

5. Mingyang, L.; Yibo, Z.; Chao, H.; Hailong, H. Unmanned aerial vehicles for search and rescue: A survey. J. Remote Sens. 2023, 15(13), 1–35.

6. Tiberiu, P.B.; Gheorghe, F.B.; Constantin, B. The use of drones in forestry. J. Environ. Sci. Eng. 2016, 557–562.

7. Trung, L.V.; Phu, V.L.; Trang, T.N.H.; Khai, H.Q. Opportunities and challenges of UAV application for monitoring the construction progress and updating the geographic database in urban area of Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. IOP Conf. Series: Earth Environ. Sci. 2023, 1170, 012014.

8. Asif, A.L.; Awais, K.J.; Rashid, A.L.; Haque, N. Unmanned aerial vehicles: A review. J. KeAi Chin. Global Impact. Cognit. Robotics. 2022, 3, 8–22.

9. Tristan, R.H.; Nicholas, C.C.; Peter, L.M.; Piotr, T.; Patrick, C. Unmanned aerial systems for precision forest inventory purposes: A review and case study. For. Chron. 2017, 93, 71–81.

10. Ruben, C.; Cagatay, C.; Ayalew, K. Plant disease detection using drones in precision agriculture. Springer - Precis. Agric. 2023, 24, 1663–1682.

11. Girma, T.; Isabella, G.; Gianni, G.; Fulvio, G.; Stefano, A.; Ivan, S. Automated identification and classification of plant species in heterogeneous plant areas using unmanned aerial vehicle-collected RGB images and transfer learning. Drones 2023, 7(599), 2–19.

12. Clément, B.; Julie, B.; Pierre, C.; Lilian, B.; Hélène, D.; Johan, O.; Renan, L.R.; Louis, R.; Lucas, M.; Plinio, Läderach, S.P.; Gond, V. UAV-based canopy textures assess changes in forest structure from long-term degradation. Ecol. Indic. 2020, 115, 106386.

13. Chiara, T. et al. Forestry applications of UAVs in Europe: A review. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2016, 33(8-10), 2427–2447.

14. Simon, E. et al. Towards operational UAV-based forest health monitoring: Species identification and crown condition assessment by means of deep learning. J. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2024, 219, 1–17.

15. Sunandana, R. Natural resource management using remote sensing and geographic information systems. J. Environ. Sci. Eng. 2023, 79–91.

16. Amit, K.R.; Nirupama, M.; Akansha, S.; Krishna, K.S. Landsat 8 OLI satellite image classification using convolutional neural network. Proceeding of the International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Data Science (ICCIDS 2019), 2020, pp. 987–993.

17. Ridwan, M.A. et al. Applications of Landsat-8 data: A survey. Int. J. Eng. Technol. 2018, 436–441.

18. Chaudhary, S.K.; Pandey, A.C.; Parida, B.R. Forest fire characterization using Landsat-8 satellite data in Dalma wildlife sanctuary. J. Remote Sens. Earth Syst. Sci. 2022, 5, 230–245.

19. Katsuto, S.; Tetsuji, O.; Nobuya, M. Detecting forest changes using dense Landsat 8 and Sentinel-1 time series data in tropical seasonal forests. J. Remote Sens. 2019, 11, 1–22.

20. Badea, O.; et al. Forest monitoring - assessment, analysis and warning system for forest ecosystem status. J. Not. Bot. Horti. Agrobo. 2013, 41(2), 613–625.

21. Sumalika, B.; Qiongyu, H.; Anupam, A.; Myat, S.M.; Franz-Eugen, A.; Peter, L. A multi sensor approach to forest type mapping for advancing monitoring of sustainable development goals (SDG) in Myanmar. J. Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 1–21.

22. MARD. Circular No. 31/2018/TT-BNNPTNT of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development: Regulations on forest boundary delineation. 2018.

23. Katsuto, S.; Wataru, M.; Takahisa, F.; Ronald, C. E. Mapping land use/land cover changes and forest disturbances in Vietnam using a Landsat temporal segmentation algorithm. J. Remote Sens. 2023, 15(3), 1–17.

24. Hansen, M.C.; Ruth, S.D. Detecting long-term global forest change using continuous fields of tree-cover maps from 8-km advanced very high resolution radiometer (AVHRR) data for the years 1982-99. J. Ecosystems. 2004, 7(7), 695–716.

25. Martínez, C.P.; Agüera, V.F.; Carvajal, R.F. Accuracy assessment of RTK/PPK UAV-photogrammetry projects using differential corrections from multiple GNSS fixed base stations. J. Geocarto Int. 2023, 38(1), 1–21.

26. Remzi, E.; Remzi, A.; Remzi, A. A comparative analysis of UAV-RTK and UAV-PPK methods in mapping different surface types. Eur. J. For. Eng. 2021, 7(1), 12–25.

27. Ferntech Commercial Company. RTK and PPK survey drones, what is the difference? Available online: https://www.ferntechcommercial.co.nz/news/rtk-and-ppk-survey-drones-what-is-the-difference.

28. Meeragandhi, G. et al. NDVI: Vegetation change detection using remote sensing and GIS – A case study of Vellore District. Conference: Elsevier Procedia 3rd International Conference on Recent Trends in Computing 2015 (ICRTC-2015) At: SRM University, Delhi Campus, 2015, 57, 1199–1210.

29. Bhandari, A.K.; Kumar, A.; Singh, G.H. Feature extraction using normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI): A case study of Jabalpur City. J. Procedia Technol. 2012, 6, 612–621.

30. Jumaat, N.F.H.; Ahmad, B.; Dutsenwai, H.S.; Land cover change mapping using high resolution satellites and unmanned aerial vehicle. IOP Conf. Series: Earth Environ. Sci. 2018, 169, 1–6.