Authors

Vu Thi Minh Nguyet 1* , Van Phu Hung 1 , Hoang Van Tha 1 , Ha Tung Lam 1 , Bui Van Quynh 1

Affiliations

1 Institute of Geological Sciences, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology; vtmnguyet@igsvn.vast.vn; vphung@igsvn.vast.vn; hvtha@igsvn.vast.vn; htlam@igsvn.vast.vn; bvquynh@igsvn.vast.vn

*Corresponding author: vtmnguyet@igsvn.vast.vn; tel.: +84–904411938

Abstracts

Cave tourist carrying capacity is the maximum number of people who can visit a cave at certain time without causing irreversible damage to the natural environment. The tourist carrying capacity of Phong Nha Cave was determined for the first time based on the cave's microclimate indicator using the Lobo method. The temperature, relative humidity (RH), and carbon dioxide (CO2) concentrations in the Phong Nha cave were regularly measured during the summer and winter of 2023. Continuous monitoring of the cave temperature was also conducted, with measurements taken every 5 minutes. The results of regular and continuous temperature monitoring in Phong Nha Cave in 2023 indicated that the total time for temperature recovery in summer and winter was 497 minutes and 318 minutes, respectively. The limit of visitor according to three tourism scenarios is 1260, 2520, and 3780 people per day, respectively. The average time of stay at Dong Tien is 7.8 minutes in summer and 12.7 minutes in winter. These new results provide valuable reference information for the management and conservation of Phong Nha - Ke Bang National Park and should be recommended for use in assessing tourist carrying capacity in other show caves in Vietnam.

Keywords

Microclimate; Temperature; Tourist carrying capacity; Phong Nha cave.

Cite this paper

Nguyet, V.T.M.; Hung, V.P.; Tha, H.V.; Lam, H.T.; Quynh, B.V. Microclimate characteristics and tourist carrying capacity of Phong Nha cave, Phong Nha - Ke Bang National Park. J. Hydro-Meteorol. 2025, 22, 45–54.

References

1. Hens, L. Tourism and environment. Master Course, Free University of Brussel, Belgium, 1998.

2. Gillieson, D. Caves: Processes, development and management. Choice Rev. Online 1996, 34(9), 34-5102–34-5102. https://doi.org/10.5860/CHOICE.34-5102.

3. Cigna, A.; Forti, P.; Moreira, J.; Carvalho, C. Caves: The most important geotouristic feature in the world. Tourism Karst Areas 2013, 6(1), 9–26.

4. Lobo, H.A.S.; Trajano, E.; Marinho, M.de.A.; Bichuette, M.E.; Scaleante, J.A.B.; Scaleante, O.A.F.; Rocha, B.N.; Laterza, F.V. Projection of tourist scenarios onto fragility maps: Framework for determination of provisional tourist carrying capacity in a Brazilian show cave. Tour. Manag. 2013, 35, 234–243. doi: 10.1016/J.TOURMAN.2012.07.008.

5. Watson, J.; Hamilton-Smith, E.; Gillieson, D.; Kiernan, K. Guidelines for cave and karst protection. IUCN, 1997.

6. Song, L.; Xiaoning, W.; Fuyuan, L. The influence of cave tourism on CO2 and temperature in Baiyun Cave, Hebei, China. Int. J. Speleol. 2000, 29B(1/4), 77–87, https://doi.org/10.5038/1827-806X.29.1.4.

7. Lario, J.; Soler, V. Microclimate monitoring of Pozalagua cave (Vizcaya, Spain): Application to Management and protection of show caves. J. Cave Karst Stud. 2010, 72(3), 169–180. https://doi.org/10.4311/JCKS2009LSC0093.

8. Debevec, V.; Rakovec, J. Impact of visits on the microclimates of caves experimental evidence from Škocjan caves. Acta Carsologica 2021, 50(2-3), 69–290.  https://doi.org/10.3986/ac.v50i2-3.7397.

9. Santos, P.L.A.; Brilha, J. A review on tourism carrying capacity assessment and a proposal for its application on geological sites. Geoheritage 2023, 15(2), 47. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12371-023-00810-3.

10. Cigna, A.A. Tourism and show caves. Artic. Int. J. Speleol. 2000, 29, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.5038/1827-806X.29.1.1.

11. Toomey, R.S. Geological monitoring of caves and associated landscapes. Geol. Monit. 2019, 27–46. https://doi.org/10.1130/2009.MONITORING(02).

12. Zelinka, J. Microclimatic research in the Slovakian show caves. Acta Carsologica 2016, 31(1), 151–163. https://doi.org/10.3986/AC.V31I1.410.

13. Šebela, S.; Baker, G.; Luke, B. Cave temperature and management implications in Lehman Caves, Great basin National Park, USA. Geoheritage 2019, 11(3), 1163–1175. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12371-019-00367-0.

14. Lobo, H.A.S.; Boggiani, P.C.; Perinotto, J.A.J. Speleoclimate dynamics in santana cave (PETAR, São Paulo state, Brazil): General characterization and implications for tourist management. Int. J. Speleol. 2015, 44(1), 61–73. https://doi.org/10.5038/1827-806X.44.1.6.

15. Danardono, D.; Putra, E.B.D.; Haryono, E.; Nurjani, E.; Sunariya, M.I.T. Speleoclimate monitoring to assess cave tourism capacity in Gelatik Cave, Gunungsewu Geopark, Indonesia. Forum Geogr. 2018, 32(2), 181–194. https://doi.org/10.23917/FORGEO.V32I2.6958.

16. ITDR Institution. Apply the formula of A.M. Cifuentes and H. Ceballos-Lascurain to calculate carrying capacity for ecotourism sites in Vietnam. Vietnam National Authority of Tourist-Institute for Tourist Development Research, 2018.

17. Anh, N.V.; Long, P.H. Asessment of tourism carrying capacity at Thung Nham ecotourism area, Ninh Binh province. J. Environ. 2024, I. (in Vietnamese).

18. Ly, T.P.; Nguyen, T.H.H. Application of carrying capacity management in Vietnamese national parks. Asia Pacific J. Tour. Res. 2017, 22(10), 1005–1020. https://doi.org/10.1080/10941665.2017.1359194.

19. Nghi, T.; Thanh, L.N.; Dinh, T.N. Tourism carrying capacity assessment for Phong Nha - Ke Bang and Dong Hoi, Quang Binh Province. VNU J. Sci. Earth Sci. 2007, 23, 80–87.

20. Cifuentes, M. Determinación de capacidad de carga turística en áreas protegidas. CATIE, Turrialba (Costa Rica), 1992, pp. 26.

21. Nghi, T.; Lan, N.T.; Thai, N.D.; Mai, D.; Thanh, D.X. Tourism carrying capacity assessment for Phong Nha-Ke Bang and Dong Hoi, Quang Binh Province. VNU J. Sci. 2007, 23, 80–87.

22. Trung, N.Q. Geology and Mineral Resources of Mahaxay - Dong Hoi, scale 1: 200 000. 1983.

23. Nghi, T.; et al. Geological History of Caves and Conservation Values  of the World Nature Heritage Phong Nha-Ke Bang National Park. VNU J. Sci. Earth Environ. Sci. 2023, 39(4), 16–31. https://doi.org/10.25073/2588-1094/VNUEES.4971.

24. Hieu, N.; Phai, V.V.; Limbert, H. Cave systems in Phong Nha - Ke Bang area. VNU J. Sci. Earth Environ. Sci. 2012, 28(4), 217–229.

25. Cheablam, O.; Rattanarat, J. Physical and ecological carrying capacity for cave tourism management. J. Environ. Manag. Tour. 2021, 12(4), 986–999. https://doi.org/10.14505//JEMT.V12.4(52).13.

26. Hoyos, M.; Soler, V.; Cañaveras, J.C.; Sánchez-Moral, S.; Sanz-Rubio, E. Microclimatic characterization of a karstic cave: Human impact on microenvironmental parameters of a prehistoric rock art cave (Candamo Cave, northern Spain). Environ. Geol. 1998, 33(4), 231–242.

27. Lobo, H.A.S. Tourist carrying capacity of Santana cave (PETAR-SP, Brazil): A new method based on a critical atmospheric parameter. Tour. Manag. Perspect. 2015, 16, 67–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TMP.2015.07.001.